Warhammer 40,000 Doubles Tournament

[Crablezworth]

I can see a problem wih someone bringing a fortress of redemption.

[Twinlinked]

perhaps a fortress of redemption could be mandatory for each team...

A.

[Henshini]

perhaps a fortress of redemption could be mandatory for each team...

A.

Hopefully they will release codex: fortress of redemption(and bloodletters?) before the tournament!

[An00bis]

hey, I thought "Codex: Bloodletters" would never happen, now theyre allies for people ...so who knows

[AngryCanadian]

I'm excited to see what changes will be made after the rule for 6th are taken into account.

IMO you shouldn't be changing written rules
Eg- The Waaagh rule for Orks states it works for all friendly Orks
Eg-#2 The Ork KFF actually protects all unit within 6", friend or enemy

I do think you should make clarifications when adapting to the format you selected.
EG- Wazdakka does not allow both players to take warbikers as troops


i fail to understand why you would make changes to clearly written rules. (Waaagh rule states it works for all friendly Orks)
Because it is written clearly in the codex, there should be no debate about it.

Maybe just Maybe the Waaagh rule was intentionally written to help friendly Orks, and by you changing it your going against the offical ruling by GW
With all the updates to the FAQS since the codex release and they still haven't changed it, its a good sign that the way its written is the way its supposed to work

i can totally agree on the Wazdakka/warbikerz issue and it even makes sense, what doesn't make sense is you changing the Waaagh rule

I mean if we can change the way rules are written lets just make the Necrons need to glance like everyone else, not auto-glance on 6's
and if you can't change that rule cause that how its written how can you justify changing another rule clearly written.

[theroyalfalcon]

We will be changing over to 6th for the double tournament, however I have not had a chance to rework the package yet, unfortunately.

[theroyalfalcon]

Rules have now been updated to reflect 6th Edition

[manidow]

Looks quite good to me, Thanks for getting them out to us having to read a rulebook and set up a tourney within the time you did is no easy task i am sure.

one question, for the floating spots we are allowed one per side of a team so my partner coudl take the heavy and i could take the fast but then no one can touch the elite slot ?

or is it so that we are not doubling up the floaters?

making it so i can have the fast my partner can roll with the elite and heavy??

Thanks

[Crablezworth]

Looks quite good to me, Thanks for getting them out to us having to read a rulebook and set up a tourney within the time you did is no easy task i am sure.

one question, for the floating spots we are allowed one per side of a team so my partner coudl take the heavy and i could take the fast but then no one can touch the elite slot ?

or is it so that we are not doubling up the floaters?

making it so i can have the fast my partner can roll with the elite and heavy??

Thanks

I think it's just you can't double up the floaters so no matter what you've got a legal force org overall as if it were 1 army (force org wise) chosen from 2 codex's.

[manidow]

I hope so thats how we are set up now my partner and I but we can work around incase we are wrong the bold ONE in the rules just got us worried