I think what he's trying to say is that right now, if you would normally have to roll a 3+ to wound if you're comparing Strength to Toughness, but have poisoned attacks that instead wound on a 4+ in all cases regardless of the to wound chart, it is no longer beneficial to have poisoned attacks in such a situation.
So, as a result, Topher is proposing and/or hoping that the rule be clarified and changed such that if your to-wound roll would normally be better than the one provided to you by the poisoned attacks rule, you should get the better of the two. In that case, according to my example above, the attacks would wound on a 3+ if the difference in S and T permits, but would wound on a 4+ if, say, the attacks would normally wound on a 5+.
Am I understanding Topher correctly?



