This FAQ just broke fantasy

Ask/Discuss the rules.

Re: This FAQ just broke fantasy

Postby tatz_101 » Fri Jul 08, 2011 6:42 pm

G-Ram wrote:
tatz_101 wrote:From my understanding that only works for shooting right now, I can understand someone trying to argue it carries over but rules as written the FAQ was for shooting attacks NOT close combat.

There I fixed the game ;)

Except that in the main rule book, they state to use the wound rules for shooting as the ones for close combat since it is one chart that follows the same rules.


yeah about that.....

*throws smoke bomb and runs away*
Orbital wrote: Why are we here? Are we worthy of love? After much consideration and inward searching, I've come to a simple but enduring perspective which guides me and even propels me, despite the persistent ambiguity that's woven into the postulated quandary as well as the satellite problems:

I like tits.
User avatar
tatz_101
 
Posts: 695
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 4:07 am
Location: Ottawa, Ontario

Re: This FAQ just broke fantasy

Postby Rosscoe » Fri Jul 08, 2011 9:21 pm

Just means some lucky guy (OR GAL) is gona do ALOT of hurt to alot of troops....or BIG ONES :P
Image <-- Why can't Marines & Orks be this way?

http://onemanstudio.webs.com/
Image
User avatar
Rosscoe
 
Posts: 770
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:16 pm

Re: This FAQ just broke fantasy

Postby G-Ram » Sat Jul 09, 2011 12:40 am

In reality the rule does not change a whole lot, instead of needing 2's you auto wound so normally it will only give you a few more wounds then normal. The big deal imo is that it kinda messes with such a core part of the game, oh well
Get Farmed.
User avatar
G-Ram
 
Posts: 750
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:00 pm

Previous

Return to Warhammer Fantasy Rules

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests