Official FAQ for a few things on the BF site

A game for those who like their World War II re-enactments very, very small.

Official FAQ for a few things on the BF site

Postby Matt Varnish » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:52 pm

http://www.flamesofwar.com/Portals/0/Do ... il2012.pdf

Hugest ones are yes indeed, you use the new national rules in the rulebook, not your Force book, and yes Mid War soviet tanks use Hen and Chicks from the new rulebook with old pricing, until they release the MW "Know your Enemy" booklet.

Also clarified are terrain vision for all forms of area terrain, which is nice.
"Yo Dennis" - some loser

"This is a game like real war, played against time, and played under circumstances of considerable excitement, and it is remarkable how elastic the measurements of quite honest and honourable men can become." - HG Wells, Little Wars, 1913!
User avatar
Matt Varnish
 
Posts: 3676
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 2:20 pm

Re: Official FAQ for a few things on the BF site

Postby Joyous_Oblivion » Sat Apr 21, 2012 1:36 pm

That's good about the National rules, it was pretty much accepted as that but it's nice to see it in writing to deal with the RAW vs. RAI people.
Current Project: Painting/assembling Tau
Current Playable Armies: MW & LW USA - most lists available (FoW), Space Marines (40K), Imperial Guard (40K), Cygnar (Warmachine)
Future Projects: New Marine army @ 1850 (40K), LW US Infantry Army in Winter Gear @ 1780 (FoW), LW Canadian Infantry Army @ 1780 (FoW)
Joyous_Oblivion
 
Posts: 4012
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 10:58 pm

Re: Official FAQ for a few things on the BF site

Postby Diragi » Sat Apr 21, 2012 2:33 pm

Other than H&C it was the obvious thing to do. Wonder how they will handle the know your deny update; act as an errata / status quo until new book / etc...

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
User avatar
Diragi
 
Posts: 1421
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 10:19 am

Re: Official FAQ for a few things on the BF site

Postby Gahris » Sat Apr 21, 2012 2:45 pm

PAK40's on medium bases are huge for me!
The Ottawa Gamer
Blog: http://ottawagamer.blogspot.com/
RankingHQ Player Id: 100742
Flames of War Dog Tag #742
User avatar
Gahris
 
Posts: 3889
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 2:56 pm
Location: ottawa

Re: Official FAQ for a few things on the BF site

Postby Thunderst » Sat Apr 21, 2012 3:11 pm

dam, i wanted to use the old QoQ tomorrow
Orbital101 wrote:In other words - and I mean this without so much as a hint of irony or sarcasm - stop trying to apply logic and common sense to the game or the models. You'll only make yourself angry.

Orbital101 wrote:Except for the fact that I'd be playing against Manidow, a guy who's so bad at 40k he thinks a cocked dice roll means the dice accidentally fell down your pants.


My Blog http://imperal-might.blogspot.com/
User avatar
Thunderst
 
Posts: 1114
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 8:38 pm

Re: Official FAQ for a few things on the BF site

Postby CA$H » Sat Apr 21, 2012 5:04 pm

Gahris wrote:PAK40's on medium bases are huge for me!



Why? They come with large, and look better on large. Also, it says you can use large anyways....what am I missing?
Whiskey is sunlight held together with water

Science flies you to the moon.
Religion flies you into buildings.

http://WWW.DICEDEVILS.COM
RankingHQ Player Id: 100620
User avatar
CA$H
 
Posts: 1481
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:44 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Re: Re: Official FAQ for a few things on the BF site

Postby Diragi » Sat Apr 21, 2012 6:16 pm

CA$H wrote:
Gahris wrote:PAK40's on medium bases are huge for me!



Why? They come with large, and look better on large. Also, it says you can use large anyways....what am I missing?


I guess you could pack together a bunch more uh... paks into 8" for defensive fire purposes/ less vulnerable to templates.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
User avatar
Diragi
 
Posts: 1421
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 10:19 am

Re: Re: Official FAQ for a few things on the BF site

Postby Joyous_Oblivion » Sat Apr 21, 2012 7:14 pm

Diragi wrote:
CA$H wrote:
Gahris wrote:PAK40's on medium bases are huge for me!



Why? They come with large, and look better on large. Also, it says you can use large anyways....what am I missing?


I guess you could pack together a bunch more uh... paks into 8" for defensive fire purposes/ less vulnerable to templates.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

This
Current Project: Painting/assembling Tau
Current Playable Armies: MW & LW USA - most lists available (FoW), Space Marines (40K), Imperial Guard (40K), Cygnar (Warmachine)
Future Projects: New Marine army @ 1850 (40K), LW US Infantry Army in Winter Gear @ 1780 (FoW), LW Canadian Infantry Army @ 1780 (FoW)
Joyous_Oblivion
 
Posts: 4012
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 10:58 pm

Re: Official FAQ for a few things on the BF site

Postby Gahris » Sat Apr 21, 2012 7:26 pm

CA$H wrote:
Gahris wrote:PAK40's on medium bases are huge for me!



Why? They come with large, and look better on large. Also, it says you can use large anyways....what am I missing?


When moving them without transport, its hard to maneuver them
The Ottawa Gamer
Blog: http://ottawagamer.blogspot.com/
RankingHQ Player Id: 100742
Flames of War Dog Tag #742
User avatar
Gahris
 
Posts: 3889
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 2:56 pm
Location: ottawa


Return to Flames of War

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron